Intrawound Vancomycin Powder Reduces Delayed Deep Surgical Site Infections Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether the use of vancomycin powder (VP) placed in the surgical site prior to wound closure prevents delayed deep surgical site infections (DDI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DDI after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients remains a significant major complication. The use of VP to prevent acute surgical site infection has been reported but the impact on DDI is unknown. METHODS: AIS patients treated over the past 20 years with PSF/instrumentation from a large muti-center registry were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: intraoperative vancomycin powder placed in the wound (VP) or no antibiotics placed in the wound (NVP). DDI was defined as an infection that occurred >90 days after surgery and required surgical intervention in the operating room. Patients who developed a DDI had secondary verification of VP use or not. Chi square and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship analyses were used to compare demographics and incident rate of DDI between groups. RESULTS: 4145 cases met inclusion for this study. A total of 43 DDI cases were identified (1.0%). The incidence of DDI for the VP group was 0.2% (4/2111), and 1.9% (39/2034) in the NVP group (P<0.001). Given the difference in follow-up for the 2 groups a Cumulative Survival and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the VP group had significantly better "survival" (no DDI) than the NVP group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: DDIs are significant, adverse events that can greatly complicate patient recovery after PSF for AIS, including rehospitalization. This study found that patients who received VP intraoperatively were 10 times less likely to develop a DDI than those who did not receive VP. Although other advances/changes in surgical techniques may contribute to the significant decrease in infections found in the more recent VP cohort, VP should be considered as a prophylactic measure.

3D analysis of the preoperative deformity in AIS can be used to guide surgical treatment decisions for selective thoracic fusion.

PURPOSE: To identify 3D measures of scoliosis from preoperative imaging that are associated with optimal radiographic outcomes after selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: Subjects with primary thoracic curves (Lenke 1-4, B or C modifiers) fused selectively (L1 or above) who had preoperative 3D reconstructions and minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. An optimal outcome at 2 years was defined as having 4 of 5 parameters previously defined in the literature: (1) lumbar curve < 26º, (2) deformity flexibility quotient < 4, (3) C7-CSVL < 2 cm, (4) lumbar prominence < 5º and (5) trunk shift < 1.5 cm. Univariate and CART analyses were performed to identify preoperative variables associated with achieving an optimal outcome 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (88F, 11 M) patients met inclusion. Mean age was 15 ± 2 years. Fifty-one subjects (52%) had an optimal outcome. Seven preoperative deformity measures representing smaller thoracolumbar/lumbar deformity in the optimal group were found to be significant on univariate analysis. CART analysis identified the following variables associated with optimal outcomes: difference in apical rotation > 30° = 27% optimal outcomes, difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex > 3° = 46% optimal outcomes, and difference in apical rotation ≤ 30° and coronal vertebral wedging of lumbar apex ≤ 3° = 80% optimal outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes after STF were associated with a preoperative difference in apical vertebral rotation in the axial plane less than 30° between thoracic and lumbar curves as well as coronal plane vertebral wedging of the lumbar apical vertebra less than 3°.

Depression Screening in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Clinics and Identifying Patients At-Risk.

BACKGROUND: Up to 25% of youth experience a depressive episode by 18 years of age, leading the US Preventive Services Task Force to recommend depression screening within this population. This study aimed to understand the prevalence of depression identified within pediatric orthopedic clinics compared with primary care clinics after the implementation of a screening program and present data on the prevalence of moderate-severe depression across specific pediatric orthopedic clinics, characterizing and identifying specific populations at higher risk. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients screened using the 2-item and 9-item versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2/PHQ-9) and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale over a 2-year period (October 2018 to January 2021) within pediatric primary care and orthopaedic clinics. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare scores between orthopedic and primary care clinics, as well as between the different pediatric orthopedic subspecialties and included χ 2 test, ANOVA, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 32,787 unique adolescent patients screened in primary care clinics, with an additional 14,078 unique adolescent patients screened in orthopaedic clinics, leading to a 30% increase in the overall number of patients receiving depression screening. 5.2% of patients in primary care pediatric clinics screened positive for moderate-severe depression versus 2.0% in pediatric orthopaedic clinics ( P <0.001). 2.7% of primary care patients were at risk of self-harm compared with 0.8% of orthopedic patients ( P <0.001). Within orthopaedic subspecialty clinics, the spine patients were at the highest risk of moderate-severe depression (3.5%), significantly higher than both the sports (1.4%, P =0.006) and patients with acute fracture (1.3%, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the high incidence of patients screening positive for depression in pediatric and adolescent orthopaedic clinics. By identifying high-risk clinics and patient groups, health care systems can apply a more practical approach and appropriately deploy behavioral health specialists for timely counseling and treatment discussions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III.

From PHQ-2 to SRS-22: how a depression screening tool relates to SRS scores in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores-a simple, validated depression screening tool-and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire scores in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). METHODS: IS patients screened for depression with the PHQ-2 who completed the SRS-22 over a 2-year period were reviewed. If PHQ-2 scores were positive (> 3), the more comprehensive PHQ-9 was administered. Median SRS-22 scores between positive and negative PHQ screens were compared. Nonparametric correlation between PHQ and SRS-22 Mental Health (MH) domain was performed. The ability of the MH domain to discriminate between patients with positive versus negative screens and patients with moderate-severe depression risk versus no-mild risk was evaluated with ROC analysis. RESULTS: 521 patients were included. Patients with + PHQ-2 screens had significantly lower total and individual domain SRS scores, especially within the MH domain (4.0 vs. 3.2). For those with moderate-severe depression risk, total and individual domain scores were also significantly lower (MH domain, 4.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.05). A weak, but significant correlation was observed between the PHQ and MH domain scores (rho = 0.32, p < 0.001). A cut-off of ≥ 3.6 on the MH domain demonstrated sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 0.86 for identifying patients at no-mild risk for depression. CONCLUSION: Recognizing mental health conditions is critical to successful IS treatment as psychosocial conditions can negatively affect treatment outcomes. IS patients scoring < 3.6 on the SRS-22 MH domain should be considered for depression screening due to an increased risk of moderate-severe depression.

SRS-22r Self-Image After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at 10-year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To examine SRS-Self Image scores at up to 10 years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Self-image is complex with implications for surgical and patient-reported outcomes after AIS surgery. Surgically modifiable factors that impact self-image are inconsistently reported in the literature with few longer-term reports. We examined the rate and durability of self-image improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An AIS registry was queried for patients with up to 10 years of follow-up after AIS surgery. A mixed effects model estimated change in SRS-22 Self Image from baseline to 6 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years. All enrolled patients contributed data to the mixed effects models. A sub-analysis of patients with 1-year and 10-year follow-up evaluated worsening/static/improved SRS-22 Self Image scores examined stability of scores over that timeline. Baseline demographic data and 1-year deformity magnitude data were compared between groups using parametric and nonparametric tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Data from 4608 patients contributed data to the longitudinal model; 162 had 1-year and 10-year data. Mean SRS-Self Image improvement at 10-year follow-up was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.9-1.1) point. No significant changes in Self-Image domain scores were estimated from 1-year to 10-year (all P >0.05) postoperative. Forty (25%) patients had SRS-Self Image worsening from 1 year to 10 years, 36 (22%) improved, and 86 (53%) were unchanged. Patients who worsened over 10 years had lower SRS-Self Image at baseline than those unchanged at enrollment (3.3 vs. 3.7, P =0.007). Neither radiographic parameters nor SRS-Mental Health were different at baseline for the enrolled patients. CONCLUSION: Ten years after surgery, 75% of patients reported similar or better SRS-Self Image scores than one year after surgery. Nearly 25% of patients reported worsening self-image at 10 years. Patients who worsened had lower baseline SRS-Self Image scores, without radiographic or mental health differences at baseline or follow-up.

Beware of open triradiate cartilage: 1 in 4 patients will lose > 10° of correction following posterior only fusion.

PURPOSE: As 2-year follow-up may not be sufficient to assess the risk of curve progression following fusion in immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), this study reports on 5-year outcomes of AIS patients, factoring in maturity and surgical approach, to determine whether immature patients are at risk of continued curve progression beyond 2 years. METHODS: A multicenter database was reviewed for AIS patients who underwent spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation and who had both 2 and 5-year follow-up. Radiographic and SRS-22 scores were compared between three groups: open triradiate cartilage-posterior fusion (OTRC-P), OTRC-combined anterior/posterior fusion (OTRC-APSF), and closed TRC (CTRC, matched to OTRC-P group). RESULTS: 142 subjects were included (67 OTRC-P, 8 OTRC-APSF, 67 CTRC). Main curve type (p = 0.592) and size (p = 0.117) were not different between groups at all timepoints. Compensatory curve size was similar at all timepoints for OTRC-P and CTRC, with a slight increase for OTRC-APSF from immediate postoperative to 5 years. At 5 years, OTRC-P had > 10° loss of correction in 25% of patients, which was greater than in the CTRC (6%) and OTRC-APSF (0%) groups (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in loss of correction of the compensatory curve or in SRS-22 scores between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those with CTRC and those treated with anterior/posterior fusion, patients with OTRC treated with posterior fusion had an increased risk of main curve progression greater than 10°, with some continued loss of correction after 2 years. This did not appear to affect patient-reported outcomes.

Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction Following Vertebral Body Tethering of Main Thoracic Curves.

BACKGROUND: Growth modulation through anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) has emerged as a fusionless option for the treatment of progressive scoliosis. When tethering the main thoracic curve, the compensatory thoracolumbar/lumbar curve must correct indirectly as a result. The present study evaluated the response of these lumbar curves following AVBT of the main thoracic curves. METHODS: Patients who underwent thoracic AVBT and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Magnitudes of the thoracic and lumbar curves were recorded preoperatively and at the first-erect and 2-year postoperative visits. Lumbar curves were further stratified according to their lumbar modifier (A, B, or C). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated-measures ANOVA were performed to compare correction rates, and the Pearson coefficient was utilized to determine the correlation between the tethered thoracic curve and uninstrumented lumbar curve magnitudes. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included. Thoracic curve correction was 40% at the first-erect visit and 43% at 2 years (p = 0.012). Lumbar correction was 30%, 26%, and 18% at the first-erect visit (p < 0.001 for all compared with preoperatively) and minimally changed at 31%, 26%, and 24% at 2 years for lumbar modifiers A, B, and C, respectively. A total of 118 patients (54%) showed thoracic curve improvement between the first-erect and 2-year visits. In a subgroup analysis, these patients had a correction in lumbar curve magnitude from preoperatively to the first-erect visit of 30%, 22%, and 16% for lumbar modifiers A, B, C, respectively, that increased to 42%, 34%, and 31% at 2 years, with strong correlation to thoracic correction at 2-year follow-up (r = 0.557, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was immediate lumbar correction following AVBT of a main thoracic curve, further improvement following initial correction was only observed among patients with growth modulation of the thoracic curve. Considering all patients, the uninstrumented lumbar curve corrected 30% at 2 years and the instrumented thoracic curve corrected 40%. As indications for AVBT are refined, these data will provide insight into the response of the uninstrumented lumbar curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How often does the preoperative plan for freehand pedicle screw placement match the actual surgical execution in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

PURPOSE: To provide a baseline for comparison with future advancements, this study determined the accuracy of preoperative planning of pedicle screw placement using standard radiographs for posterior fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: Ninety-five patients with AIS planned for PSF were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative planning was based upon standard upright posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. The planned number of screws to be placed at each level was recorded. Intraoperatively, all screws were placed by freehand technique. The number of successfully placed screws and the reasons for abandoning screw placement were documented. RESULTS: There were a total of 1783 pedicle screws planned preoperatively. The average planned implant density was 2.0 implants/vertebra. A total of 1723 (96.6%) of the planned screws were placed successfully. Fourteen (0.8%) screws were abandoned after attempted placement (range 0-2 screws/case). Of 241 screws planned in pedicles noted to be "hypoplastic," 13 resulted in the use of a hook or no instrumentation. The placement was not attempted for 49 (range 0-7/case) planned screws due to intraoperative decision-making and a sense that the curve was flexible enough not to require every screw. Three cases (3.2%) required instrumentation of an additional level. CONCLUSIONS: Standard spine radiographs allow for accurate preoperative planning for freehand pedicle screw placement in AIS. Ninety-seven percent of planned screws were placed successfully. The primary reason for deviation from the preoperative plan was intraoperative surgeon decision-making rather than difficulty with screw placement. This study will serve as a baseline when considering the utilization of navigation in PSF for AIS.

Preoperative factors associated with optimal outcomes of selective thoracic fusion at 5 years.

PURPOSE: Prior work identified optimal outcomes at 2 years following selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) but it is unclear whether these published predictors represent what is required to achieve an optimal outcome with further time and potential growth. The purpose of this study was to determine the preoperative factors associated with optimal outcome of STF for AIS at 5 years. METHODS: Patients with primary thoracic AIS (Lenke 1-4C curves) who underwent a STF and had minimum 5 years of follow-up were included. Optimal postoperative outcomes for a STF included a deformity-flexibility quotient (DFQ) < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, lumbar correction > 37%, C7-CSVL < 2 cm, lumbar prominence < 5°, and trunk shift < 1.5 cm. These outcomes were used to determine whether adhering to published recommendations for STF increased the likelihood of obtaining an optimal outcome at 5 years, which included: preoperative lumbar curve < 45°, lumbar bend < 25°, apical vertebral translation ratio > 1.2, and thoracic/thoracolumbar Cobb ratio > 1.2. RESULTS: 127 patients met inclusion. A preoperative lumbar curve < 45° was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving three of the optimal outcomes: DFQ < 4, lumbar curve < 26°, and lumbar prominence < 5°. Following the 25° bend rule resulted in two optimal outcomes, while Cobb ratio > 1.2 was only associated with one optimal outcome. AVT > 1.2 was not significantly associated with any optimal outcome measures. CONCLUSION: This study found that at 5 years, performing a STF when there is a preoperative lumbar Cobb < 45° remained the best guideline for increasing the likelihood of an optimal outcome.

Anterior vertebral body tethering for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis leads to asymmetric growth of the periapical vertebrae.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 3D growth of the periapical vertebrae and discs in the 2 years after anterior vertebral body tether (AVBT) placement in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). METHODS: Patients with IS treated with AVBT, ≥ 2 years of follow-up, and 3D spine reconstructions created from simultaneous, biplanar radiographs were studied. Patients were divided into two groups: progressive scoliosis correction (PC) or no/limited correction (NPC). The average of the 3 apical vertebral and disc heights and angular measures were made. The rate of change for each measure (mm/mo, °/mo) from first erect to 2-year follow-up was compared between groups. RESULTS: Fourteen (Risser 0, Sanders 2-3) patients aged 11.4 ± 1.4 years with right thoracic scoliosis of 52 ± 9° were included. There were 7 patients per group (6F, 1M). Mean follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.1 (range 2-5) years. PC left-sided vertebral height increased 0.13 mm/months compared to 0.05 mm/mo in the NPC group (p = 0.001). Right (tethered side) vertebral growth was not different (PC: 0.07 mm/mo, NPC: 0.05 mm/mo, p = 0.2). Coronal vertebral wedging occurred at - 0.11°/mo compared to - 0.02°/mo for the PC and NPC groups, respectively (p = 0.004). Coronal disc angulation change was - 0.12°/mo in the PC group and - 0.04°/mo in the NPC group (p = 0.03), and was associated with loss of right disc height (PC: - 0.06 mm/mo) with little effect on the left disc height (PC: -0.01 mm/mo). CONCLUSIONS: AVBT in immature patients with thoracic scoliosis can asymmetrically modulate growth of the periapical vertebrae and discs. Progressive reduction in scoliosis after AVBT was associated with greater concave growth rates in the vertebrae and loss of disc height on the convex side.

Are patients who return for 10-year follow-up after AIS surgery different from those who do not?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of patients lost to follow-up on outcomes of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at 10-year postoperative. METHODS: Preoperative, 2-year, and 5-year postoperative demographic, radiographic, and SRS-22 data from a prospective multi-center registry were compared between patients with a 10-year follow-up visit versus those without. A second analysis utilized variables that were different between the groups, along with SRS scores, in a cohort of patients with preoperative, 2-, 5-, and 10-year postoperative SRS scores (complete cohort) to impute missing 10-year data (imputed cohort) utilizing Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: 250 patients had 10-year follow-up (21%). Those with 10-year follow-up had a greater percentage of patients who underwent anterior procedures (p < 0.05). Radiographically, the groups were similar at all three time points. SRS-22 scores demonstrated slightly worse pain and function preoperatively and at 2 year in those lost to follow-up (effect size eta = 0.11-0.12), with no differences at 5 year. Imputed data analysis demonstrated similar trends over time in SRS-22 scores compared to the complete cohort for total score and all domains except pain. There was no significant difference in imputed versus complete 10-year SRS-22 scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study identified early differences between patients with 10-year follow-up and those without, though effect sizes were small and non-existent at 5 years. SRS-22 scores at 10 year between the complete and imputed data sets did not differ. Clinically relevant outcomes of the subset who followed-up at 10 year are likely generalizable to the entire eligible AIS population.

Factors associated with increased back pain in primary thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 10 years after surgery.

PURPOSE: To identify the prevalence and predictors of nonspecific back pain in primary thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients at 10 years after surgery. METHODS: This was a case-control multi-center study. A query of patients who underwent surgical correction of major thoracic AIS between 1997 and 2007 with 10-year follow-up was reviewed. SRS-22 pain scores at 10 years were classified as below normal (≤ 2 standard deviations below average for controls of similar age/sex from published literature) or within/above the control range. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-one patients with an average of 10.5 ± 0.8-years follow-up were included. Average age at surgery was 14 ± 2 years. The rate of pain was 23% for males and 11% for females (p = 0.08). Differences in age, 10-year SRS mental health score, and radiographic measures were noted. Of 12 patients who underwent revision surgery, 42% reported below normal pain scores versus 11% in cases without revision (p = 0.012). Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified 10-year thoracic curve magnitude and 10-year mental health scores as significant predictors. Thoracic Cobb of ≤ 26° at 10 years was associated with a 7% rate of below normal pain scores compared to 27.5% when the curve was > 26° (OR = 4.8, p < 0.05). Of those with a curve ≤ 26°, no patients had abnormal pain if the SRS mental health score was > 4.2 and 15% had more pain than normal if mental health score was ≤ 4.2 (OR 23, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Increased primary thoracic curve magnitude (> 26°) at 10 years was the primary predictor of increased pain. For patients with less coronal deformity (< 26°), a poor mental health score was associated with an increased rate of pain. Male gender and revision surgery may also play a role in increased pain, however, the overall frequency of these variables were low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves.

PURPOSE: To identify curve/correction characteristics associated with adding-on at 2 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in Lenke 1/2 AR curves. METHODS: A prospective multicenter registry was queried to identify patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Lenke 1/2 AR curves, who underwent PSF with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient characteristics as well as pre- and post- operative radiographic variables were evaluated using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to determine which factors contribute to adding-on. RESULTS: 253 patients treated with PSF were assessed for adding-on, of which 50 met our adding-on criteria. Univariate analysis revealed adding-on was associated several factors including: post-operative thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude (p > 0.001), first erect (FE) end instrumented vertebra (EIV) angulation (p = 0.009) and EIV translation (p = 0.001), younger age (p = 0.027), Risser stage (p = 0.024), and a more proximal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) (p < 0.001). Multivariate CART analysis showed the chance of adding-on was more than 2 times greater (42 vs 16%) when the chosen LIV was translated more than 2.7 cm from the CSVL. When the LIV was within 2.7 cm, the post-op risk of adding-on was increased when the LIV was not perfectly leveled (> 0.5°). CONCLUSION: In Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves, pre-operative LIV translation appears to be an independent risk factor for adding-on; and in those with < 2.7 cm of LIV translation, FE LIV angulation also seems to increase the risk of adding-on. These factors are relevant in determining appropriate LIV selection and aid in identifying patients at risk for developing adding-on.

Rate of Scoliosis Correction After Anterior Spinal Growth Tethering for Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate associations between changes in segmental vertebral coronal angulation (screw angulation) and overall height after anterior spinal growth tethering for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis and to compare the rates of coronal angulation change using the preoperative Sanders stage. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent anterior spinal growth tethering between 2012 and 2016 and had ≥2 years of follow-up were retrospectively studied. We calculated each segment's screw angulation rate of change (degrees/month) and each patient's height velocity (cm/month) between each of the visits (3 to 12 visits/patient) and divided the visits into 4 groups by postoperative duration (<1 year, 1 to 2 years, >2 to 3 years, >3 years). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the preoperative Sanders stage. Generalized estimating equations and repeated-measures correlation were utilized for analyses with non-independent samples. RESULTS: We analyzed 23 patients (16 female, 7 male) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 12.2 ± 1.6 years who had right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis (mean, 53° ± 8°). All patients were immature at the time of surgery (Risser stage 0 or 1, Sanders stage 2 or 3). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.4 ± 1.1 years (range, 2 to 5 years). The rate of change for each segment's screw angulation after anterior spinal growth tethering was -0.16°, -0.14°, -0.05°, and 0.03° per month (with negative values indicating a reduction in scoliosis) for <1 year, 1 to 2 years, >2 to 3 years, and >3 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.001), and the mean height velocity was 0.65, 0.57, 0.30, and 0.19 cm per month for <1 year, 1 to 2 years, >2 to 3 years, and >3 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Changes in screw angulation correlated with height increases after anterior spinal growth tethering (r = -0.46, p < 0.001). Scoliosis correction for patients in the Sanders stage-2 group continued for 3 years (0.23°, 0.23°, and 0.09° per level per month for the first 3 years, respectively) and occurred at more than twice the rate for patients in the Sanders stage-3 group, for whom scoliosis correction ceased 2 years postoperatively (0.11° and 0.09° per level per month for the first 2 years, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Scoliosis correction was associated with overall height changes and occurred primarily within 2 to 3 years after surgery in this cohort of largely Risser stage-0 patients. The correction rate was 2.8° per segment per year for the first 2 years in the Sanders stage-2 group, compared with 1.2° per segment per year for the Sanders stage-3 group. Surgical timing that considers the patient's skeletal maturity is an important factor in generating proper postoperative correction after anterior spinal growth tethering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Randomized controlled trial of energy healing effects on pain and anxiety in AIS posterior surgery: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Energy healing (EH) is a part of the diverse group of Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of EH therapy prior to and following posterior surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) compared to controls. METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to one of two groups: standard operative care for surgery (controls) vs. standard care with the addition of three EH sessions. The outcomes included visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and anxiety (0-10), days until conversion to oral pain medication, and length of hospital stay. For the experimental group, VAS was assessed pre- and post-EH session. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled-28 controls and 22 EH patients. The controls had a median of 12 levels fused vs. 11 in the EH group (p = 0.04). Pre-operative thoracic and lumbar curve magnitudes were similar (p > 0.05). Overall VAS pain scores increased from pre- to post-operative (p < 0.001), whereas the VAS anxiety scores decreased immediately post-operative (p < 0.001). The control and pre-EH assessments were statistically similar. Significant decreases in VAS pain and anxiety scores from pre to post-EH assessment were noted for the EH group. Both groups transitioned to oral pain medication a median of 2 days post-operative (p = 0.11). The median days to discharge was four in the controls and three in the EH group (p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, EH therapy resulted in a decrease in patient's pre-operative anxiety. Offering this CAM modality may enhance the wellbeing of the patient and their overall recovery when undergoing posterior surgical correction for AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.

Changes in peri-apical vertebral body and intervertebral disc shape in both the sagittal and coronal planes correlate with scoliosis severity: a 3D study of 397 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate associations between vertebrae and disc shape asymmetry and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curve severity. METHODS: Analysis included normal screening referrals and patients with right, main thoracic AIS who underwent upright, biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstruction at a single institution from 2010 to 2015. Peri-apical anterior, posterior, right, and left vertebral body heights (aVBH, pVBH, rVBH, lVBH) and intervertebral disc heights (DH) were measured, and ratios of these measurements were calculated in sagittal and coronal planes. Correlations were performed between curve severity and height measurements. Sagittal and coronal plane components of these measurements were compared between normal controls with coronal curve measurements < 11° and patients with moderate (11°-49°) and severe curves (≥ 50°), with tolerance intervals established for the normal controls. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 397 patients. Patients with AIS had coronal curve measurements ranging from 11° to 101°. Greater coronal curve severity strongly correlated with smaller pVBH relative to aVBH and moderately correlated with smaller pDH relative to aDH (r = - 0.643, r = - 0.305, respectively). aVBH was greater for larger curves; pVBH remained stable. Scoliosis severity strongly correlated with right relative to left VBH and DH ratios (r = 0.919, r = 0.865 respectively). In comparison of normal controls to severe curves, severe curves had significantly greater aVBH and aDH, while pVBH was not significantly different and pDH was significantly less. Nearly half (46.9%) of the severe curves were below the range of normal for PA vertebral height ratio. CONCLUSION: In right, main thoracic AIS, greater main thoracic curve severity is associated with greater sagittal and coronal plane asymmetry of both the vertebral bodies and the discs. Severity more strongly correlates with vertebral changes in symmetry than with disc changes, though both are present.

Predictors of spontaneous lumbar curve correction in thoracic-only fusions: 3D analysis in AIS.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how 3D parameters of the instrumented thoracic spine relate to the uninstrumented lumbar spine following thoracic-only fusion (TOF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and determine the factors predictive of lumbar correction. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective review was conducted of AIS patients with Lenke 1-4 B or C curves undergoing fusion of their thoracic spine only with minimum 2-year follow-up and 3D spine reconstructions from biplanar radiography. Pre-operative to 2-year post-operative differences were evaluated. Pearson's correlations were used to identify 3D coronal, sagittal and axial relationships at 2 years post-operative. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify variables most predictive of lumbar curve correction. RESULTS: Eighty-four AIS patients met inclusion (54 B modifiers, 30 C modifiers). Average pre-operative thoracic and lumbar curves were 54 ± 9° and 41 ± 7° and corrected to 19 ± 7° and 21 ± 7°, respectively. 3D T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis increased from 6 ± 13° to 26 ± 8°. Thoracic and lumbar apical rotation decreased from - 14 ± 6° to -5 ± 6° and 13 ± 5° to 11 ± 6°, respectively. Thoracic curve correction correlated with lumbar curve correction (r = 0.67, p = 0.001) and decreased LIV tilt correlated with smaller residual lumbar curve magnitude (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). Increasing 3D kyphosis of the instrumented segment correlated with increased percentage lumbar curve correction (r = 0.29, p = 0.009). Multivariate linear regression showed LIV tilt and thoracic curve magnitude as the most predictive variables of post-operative residual lumbar curve magnitude, and percent correction of the thoracic curve and change in 3D instrumented kyphosis as most predictive of percent correction of the lumbar curve. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of 3D data highlights several considerations for AIS patients undergoing TOF. Maximizing thoracic curve correction, leveling the LIV, and to a lesser extent, restoring kyphosis in the instrumented segment are the factors most likely to result in greater correction of the instrumented lumbar curve following thoracic-only fusions in Lenke 1-4 B and C curves.

Radiographic Coronal Imbalance and Shoulder Asymmetry Continue to Improve Between 2 and 5 Years Following Surgery of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Managing patients with coronal imbalance (CI) and shoulder height asymmetry following scoliosis surgery can be challenging. Little is known about the course of findings over time and whether they improve or persist. The aim was to report the rate of suboptimal radiographic CI or shoulder asymmetry (SA) at 5 years in patients who were already reported to have CI or SA 2 years after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: An AIS database was reviewed for patients with both 2- and 5-year follow-up after surgery. From this cohort, patients with CI>2 cm or SA>2 cm at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated, using the same parameters, at 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 916 patients, 157 (17%) patients had CI and 69 (8%) patients had SA at 2-year follow-up. At 5 years this improved to 53 (6%) and 11 patients (1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Having coronal or shoulder imbalance 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee continued imbalance 5 years after surgery. Most patients demonstrate some improvement in these measures of clinical deformity. Anticipating the potential course following a postoperative coronal balance and shoulder height differences can help surgeons manage and counsel their patients appropriately. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.

Long-term Patient Perception Following Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis if Dissatisfied at 2-year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the rate of patients who report low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores at 2 years following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) improves by 5 years postoperatively. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: HRQOL scores are dependent upon a number of factors and even in instances of good surgical correction of a spinal deformity, are not guaranteed to be high postoperatively. Understanding how a low HRQOL score varies over the postoperative period can help surgeons more effectively counsel patients and temper expectations. METHODS: A multicenter database was reviewed for patients with both 2 and 5-year follow-up after spinal fusion and instrumentation for AIS. From a cohort of 916 patients, 52 patients with low HRQOL scores at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated at 5-year follow-up. A low HRQOL outcome was defined as having SRS-22 domain or total scores less than 2 standard deviations below the mean score. Reoperations were also evaluated to determine if they were associated with HRQOL scores. RESULTS: Of those patients with low SRS-22 HRQOL scores at 2 years postoperatively, improvements were seen in all SRS-22 domains and total scores at the 5-year time point. The greatest change was seen in the satisfaction category where 41 patients showed improvement. The rate of reoperations during this period did not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Having a low HRQOL score 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee a low score 5 years after surgery. Promisingly, most patients demonstrate some improvement in all domains for patient-reported SRS-22 scores at 5-year compared to 2-year follow-up. Understanding the longer term postoperative evolution in patient-reported outcomes may help surgeons to effectively manage and counsel patients who are dissatisfied in the short term.Level of Evidence: 3.